Discussion Forums

Re: Mutually Exclusive Values in Set
Jacob Northey / The LaSalle Technology Group
7 Nov 2008 8:47AM ET

> Why wouldn't the enum attribute within the set serve the same purpose.
> The enum attribute is for single values and requires the same number of
> bits. What is the advantage of introducing another attribute?

The Set represents MultiValueString fields which are enumerations. The option group just specifies which values are mutually exclusive. Using enum here instead of option is just a matter of semantics. I picked option because it won't get confused with the enum field and option seems to indicate you only get one choice.


FAST Extension proposal - SET
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   28 Sep 2008 3:21AM ET
Mutually Exclusive Values in Set
Jacob Northey / The LaSalle Technology Group   6 Nov 2008 4:59PM ET
Re: Mutually Exclusive Values in Set
Hanno Klein / Deutsche Börse Systems   7 Nov 2008 7:56AM ET
Re: Mutually Exclusive Values in Set
Jacob Northey / The LaSalle Technology Group   7 Nov 2008 8:47AM ET
Re: FAST Extension proposal - SET
Darshan Khedekar   11 Nov 2008 11:07AM ET
Re: FAST Extension proposal - SET
Darshan Khedekar   11 Nov 2008 11:16AM ET