|
FAST Protocol
< Previous Next >
Re: Weigh-in please - Template format: XML and/or Compact Notation
Clive Browning / Rapid Addition Ltd 28 Apr 2006 6:04PM ETI concur: we are currently using the XML format rather than CN.
We also feel that the XML format is more extensible if we decide that we want to add our own custom attributes for example to define the layout of the intput or output streams.
Personall I also feel it is much more readable.
Clive
Rapid Addition Ltd
> Personally I prefer the XML format over CN for 2 reasons :
>
> 1) It is more precise with regards to the data types being used and also
> includes constructs to express concepts such as dictionary scope.
>
> 2) From a support perspective the XML format is more accessible to
> support engineers and non-coders supporting/configuring a FAST based
> application.
>
> Darren.
Re: Weigh-in please - Template format: XML and/or Compact Notation Clive Browning / Rapid Addition Ltd 28 Apr 2006 6:04PM ET
|