Discussion Forums

Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Jacob Northey / The LaSalle Technology Group
29 Sep 2008 1:22PM ET

> The effect of 2 and 3 is that the one byte in 3 gets amortized over 8
> reference occurrences of the field. Less than 8 references per
> definitions results in pmap being more compact, more than 8 references
> means leading zero byte results in definition being more compact.

Since FAST is a byte-level protocol, it is an all or nothing cost. Either using an additional presence bit increases the presence map size or it doesn't. This is up to template designers to take into account.


FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   28 Sep 2008 3:24AM ET
Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   28 Sep 2008 4:23AM ET
Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   28 Sep 2008 4:52AM ET
Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Jacob Northey / The LaSalle Technology Group   29 Sep 2008 10:34AM ET
Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   29 Sep 2008 12:42PM ET
Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   29 Sep 2008 12:50PM ET
Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Jacob Northey / The LaSalle Technology Group   29 Sep 2008 1:12PM ET
Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Jacob Northey / The LaSalle Technology Group   29 Sep 2008 1:22PM ET
Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   29 Sep 2008 2:48PM ET
Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Craig Richards / BourseTech   29 Sep 2008 11:21AM ET
Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   29 Sep 2008 11:49AM ET