|
FAST Protocol
< Previous Next >
Re: FAST Complaints
Brandon Yuille / BWY Systems
27 Jan 2010 4:29PM ET Thanks Dale,
Yes it did sound sarcastic to me. I think I was feeling a little sensitive as my implementation of FAST was something I took a great deal of care on building. Which is why I brought up the point I did, as out of the entire FAST spec, the placement of the template id is the only thing that seemed wrong to me.
Anyway, thanks again for letting me know there was no harm intended and for the summarization of Majkara's comment.
Brandon
> Hi Brandon,
>
> > I'm resigning trying to explain my point. It doesn't seem like anyone
> > wants to actually read what I'm saying.
>
> It sounds like my comment came across with the wrong tone. Sorry.
>
> When I used the word "respectfully" it was literal. I was not being
> sarcastic! Given the other conversation going on [1] I was trying to
> make it clear that my statement respected your proposal even though I
> was offering a counter argument.
>
> The point I was trying to make -- putting the PMAP first improves
> compression for some cases -- I believe Rolf covered.
>
>
> Dale
>
> [1] I believe I can summarize Majkara's recent emails in four words
> without loss of content: "I don't like FAST."
Re: FAST Complaints
Brandon Yuille / BWY Systems 27 Jan 2010 4:29PM ET
|
