Discussion Forums

FAST Protocol   < Previous   Next >

Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Jacob Northey / The LaSalle Technology Group
29 Sep 2008 10:34AM ET

My vote is for the following implementation

 1. Map should not be able to combine with other operators
 2. The presence bit should indicate reference or definition
 3. Nullable fields should be encoded as a 0 presence bit and a zero reference

Example:

1. Defining a new value:

PBIT: 1
ENCODING: 0x81 0x49 0x42 0xCD

Store the value "IBM" into cache index 1. Set field value to "IBM"

2. Referencing a value:

PBIT: 0
ENCODING: 0x81

Set field value to cached value "IBM"

3. Sending a null value:

PBIT: 0
ENCODING: 0x80

Set field value to null

FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   28 Sep 2008 3:24AM ET

Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
David Rosenborg / Pantor Engineering AB   28 Sep 2008 4:23AM ET

Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   28 Sep 2008 4:52AM ET

Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Jacob Northey / The LaSalle Technology Group   29 Sep 2008 10:34AM ET

Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   29 Sep 2008 12:42PM ET

Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   29 Sep 2008 12:50PM ET

Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Jacob Northey / The LaSalle Technology Group   29 Sep 2008 1:12PM ET

Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Jacob Northey / The LaSalle Technology Group   29 Sep 2008 1:22PM ET

Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   29 Sep 2008 2:48PM ET

Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Craig Richards / BourseTech   29 Sep 2008 11:21AM ET

Re: FAST Extension proposal - MAP
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   29 Sep 2008 11:49AM ET