Discussion Forums

Re: Nested Group questions
Jim Northey / Jordan and Jordan
19 Apr 2006 12:04AM ET

Sounds like the consensus is that nested repeating groups are a part of FAST 1.0

> Although the TE spec doesn't or hasn't address the multi-level nesting
> of repeating group in detail, the implementation at NYFIX provides fulll
> support of multi-level nesting of repeating group.
>
> wk
>
> > This is a very relevant question.
> >
> > I don't think so. The issue hasn't been discussed in detail.
> >
> > The spec doesn't contain a complete treatise of the subject.
> >
> > The POC project implemented one level of nesting within messages to
> > handle MD repeating groups.
> >
> > We've implemented full multi-level nesting at Pantor for the FAST
> > Tunnel, but I expect that we'll need to update our impl to track the
> > standard as the standard matures.
> >
> > Dave, Greg, Wei, it would be interesting to hear what you guys at
> > TransactTools, Cameron, and Nyfix respectively are aiming for?
> >
> > > Is the general consensus that the FAST 1.0 specifies / includes full
> > > multiple level nesting of groups including repeating groups?


Nested Group questions
Jim Northey / Jordan and Jordan   7 Apr 2006 12:28PM ET
Re: Nested Group questions
Rolf Andersson / Pantor Engineering   9 Apr 2006 1:14AM ET
Re: Nested Group questions
Jim Northey / Jordan and Jordan   9 Apr 2006 10:41AM ET
Re: Nested Group questions
Wei Koek / NYFIX   11 Apr 2006 8:20AM ET
Re: Nested Group questions
Jim Northey / Jordan and Jordan   19 Apr 2006 12:04AM ET